Comments Received From Individuals
Name |
City, State |
Question |
| Dorothy |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Annika Abel |
|
General Comments |
| Jean Ackor |
Springfield, VA
|
General Comments |
| Kent Akin |
Johnson City, TN
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Kent Akin |
Johnson City, TN
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jan Alexander |
Unity, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Jack Allen |
|
General Comments |
| Miscelle Allison |
Yellow Jacket, CO
|
General Comments |
| Steven Altizer |
Mechanicsville, VA
|
General Comments |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section E, Question 2. What points of comparison could an agency use when reviewing another agency's use of a similar categorical exclusion in order to establish a new categorical exclusion? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Ken Anderson |
Burbank, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Joni Arends |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Joni Arends |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Joni Arends |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jay Armbruster |
Knoxville, TN
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Richard Artley |
Grangeville, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Bonnie Atwood |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Michael Azerrad |
New York, NY
|
General Comments |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section E, Question 2. What points of comparison could an agency use when reviewing another agency's use of a similar categorical exclusion in order to establish a new categorical exclusion? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| William P. Jr. Barron |
Fairborn, OH
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Lesa Barton |
Grants Pass, Oregon
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Robert Barton |
Grants Pass, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Lesa Barton |
Grants Pass, Oregon
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Lesa Barton |
Grants Pass, OR
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Ron Bass |
Sacramento, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Ron Bass |
Sacramento, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Ron Bass |
Sacramento, CA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Ron Bass |
Sacramento, CA
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Vernon Bates |
Nashville, TN
|
General Comments |
| Vernon Bates |
Nashville, TN
|
General Comments |
| Chris Bayham |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Betty & George Beaver |
Hot Springs National Park, AR
|
General Comments |
| Jesse Bennett |
Pomfret, MD
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Gregory Bennett |
Ludlow, MA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Gregory Bennett |
Ludlow, MA
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Gregory Bennett |
Ludlow, MA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Gregory Bennett |
Ludlow, MA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Dick Benoit |
Reno, NV
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Dick Benoit |
Reno, NV
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Dick Benoit |
Reno, NV
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Dick Benoit |
Reno, NV
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Wanda Benton |
Salem, MO
|
General Comments |
| Ronald Berry |
Liberty, MO
|
Section D, Question 3. What aspects of adaptive management may, or may not, require subsequent NEPA analyses? |
| Ronald Berry |
Liberty, MO
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Ronald Berry |
Liberty, MO
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Ronald Berry |
Liberty, MO
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Linda Blum |
Quincy, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Ray Bornstein |
|
General Comments |
| Cassandra Botts |
Joseph, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Tricia Bourgal Cernoch |
|
General Comments |
| Jerry Boyer |
Spearfish, SD
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Pete Brady |
|
General Comments |
| Brian Broadus |
Charlottesville, VA
|
General Comments |
| Waylen Brucker |
|
General Comments |
| Bill Brunworth |
Redstone, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Janice Bryson |
Tolleson, AZ
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Stephen Buckley |
West Chatham, MA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Stephen Buckley |
West Chatham, MA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Stephen Buckley |
West Chatham, MA
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Stephen Buckley |
West Chatham, MA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Nathaniel Butts |
Bowling Green, KY
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| J Campbell |
|
General Comments |
| James Carrow |
|
General Comments |
| Cristi Cave |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Richard Chamberlin |
|
General Comments |
| Miles Champion |
|
General Comments |
| Adam Chase |
Pasadena, CA
|
General Comments |
| Sally Cheung |
Salt Lake City, UT
|
General Comments |
| Sally Cheung |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| John Chinn |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| John Chinn |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Kenneth Christenson |
|
General Comments |
| Patty Clary |
Eureka, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mike Clayton |
|
General Comments |
| Susan Clemens |
Running Springs, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Jerry Coalgate |
Alexandria, VA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Sanford Cohen |
Prescott Valley, AZ
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Sanford Cohen |
Prescott Valley, AZ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Steve Cone |
Farmington, NM
|
General Comments |
| Steve Cone |
Farmington, NM
|
General Comments |
| Steve Cone |
Farmington, NM
|
General Comments |
| Stephen Cox |
Fort Worth, TX
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Barbara Crayton |
|
General Comments |
| Scott Curtis |
Seattle, WA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Randall Dahl |
Palmer, AK
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Mary Darling |
Tucson, AZ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Mary Darling |
Tucson, AZ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Mary Darling |
Tucson, AZ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Laura Davimes |
Chesterfield, VA
|
General Comments |
| James Davis |
Erie, PA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Evan Davis |
Glen Allen, VA
|
General Comments |
| Evan Davis |
Glen Allen, VA
|
General Comments |
| Dennis Day |
Happy Camp, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| James De Pree |
Yreka, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mitch DeGregorio |
Sacramento, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Susan Delles |
Rogue River, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Cheryl Deutsch |
Glen Allen, VA
|
General Comments |
| Cheryl Deutsch |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Susan Dobbelaere |
Bonner Springs, KS
|
General Comments |
| Mark Donham |
Brookport, IL
|
General Comments |
| A Doran |
Golden, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| A Doran |
Golden, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Thomas Doyle |
Corrales, NM
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| John Dye |
Houston, TX
|
General Comments |
| Daniel Efseaff |
Chico, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Kevin J Egan |
Brooklyn Heights, NY
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Patricia Elliott |
Altadena, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Fred Fall |
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Arthur Feinstein |
San Francisco, CA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Bari Feinstein |
Glen Rock, NJ
|
General Comments |
| Robert Fener |
Amherst, Va
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Gloria Flora |
Helena, MT
|
General Comments |
| Jeff Forester |
Minneapolis, MN
|
General Comments |
| Vickie Foster |
|
General Comments |
| Maregaret Ann Spiers Frank |
Vashon Island, WA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Margaret Ann Spiers Frank |
Vashon Island, WA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Margaret Ann Spiers Frank |
Vashon Island, WA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Ann Frisch |
Oshkosh, WI
|
General Comments |
| Sarah Gasiewicz |
North Las Vegas, NV
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Sarah Gasiewicz |
North Las Vegas, NV
|
General Comments |
| David Gerow |
Kilauea, Hi
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Michael S. Giaimo, Esq. |
Concord, NH
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Steve Gil |
Dyer, IN
|
General Comments |
| Brenda Gillen |
Manitou Springs, CO
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Debbie Giniewicz |
|
General Comments |
| Joe Glenn |
|
General Comments |
| David Goode |
Jamestown, KY
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Declan Gould |
|
General Comments |
| Declan Gould |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Maeve Gould |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Maeve Gould |
|
General Comments |
| Michael Grauer |
|
General Comments |
| Ruth Greenberg |
Grants Pass, Oregon
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Cheryl Furlong Gross |
Williamsburg, VA
|
General Comments |
| Carolyn Guedri |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Carolyn Guedri |
Glen Allen, VA
|
General Comments |
| Gary Gunnels |
South Royalton, VT
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Melissa Guzman |
Albuquerque, NM
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Pat Gwin |
Tahlequah, OK
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mark Habbeshaw |
Kanab, UT
|
General Comments |
| Gary Hall |
Olney, MT
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Thomas Hammond |
Seattle, WA
|
General Comments |
| James Harless |
Oak Ridge, TN
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Carla Harper |
Cortez, CO
|
General Comments |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section D, Question 3. What aspects of adaptive management may, or may not, require subsequent NEPA analyses? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Peter Havens |
Bainbridge Island, WA
|
General Comments |
| Amy Hayes |
Maryville, TN
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Thomas Heffernan |
Eglin Air Force Base, FL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| karry herrington |
garland, TX
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Leslie Hight |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Jennifer Hoffman |
Jacksonville, FL
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Jennifer Hoffman |
Jacksonville, FL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Elizabeth Holbrook |
Columbia Falls, MT
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Elizabeth Holbrook |
Columbia Falls, MT
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Heidi Holeman |
Norman, OK
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Karen Hood |
Buellton, CA
|
General Comments |
| Jim Hunter |
New Vernon, NJ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section D, Question 3. What aspects of adaptive management may, or may not, require subsequent NEPA analyses? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Dr John Irving |
|
General Comments |
| Pamela Irwin |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| lena james |
Olive Hill, KY
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Travis Jarrell |
San Diego, CA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Travis Jarrell |
San Diego, CA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Peter Jenkins |
Washington, DC
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Sidney Jenson |
Farmington, UT
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Robert Johnson |
Albuquerque, NM
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Tony Johnson |
|
General Comments |
| Brian Jones |
|
General Comments |
| Charles Justice |
Bowie, MD
|
General Comments |
| Gary Kaminski |
Lingonier, PA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| David Kaplan |
Davis, CA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| David Kaplan |
Davis, CA
|
General Comments |
| John Kastl |
Tacoma, WA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Judy Keeler |
Animas, NM
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Judy Keeler |
Animas, NM
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Vilas Keith |
|
General Comments |
| Christine Keller |
Hartville, OH
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Kathy Kelly |
Arlington, VA
|
General Comments |
| Loren Kilp |
|
General Comments |
| Thomas King |
Silver Spring, MD
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Lisa Kirk |
Bozeman, MT
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Dana Knox |
Glen Ellyn, IL
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Dana Knox |
Glen Ellyn, IL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Dana Knox |
Glen Ellyn, IL
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Dana Knox |
Glen Ellyn, IL
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Jonathan Kusel |
Taylorsville, CA
|
General Comments |
| Joseph Lamphear |
Santa Ana, CA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Luis Lemus |
|
General Comments |
| Geraldine Link |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Terry Jonathan Lodge |
Toledo, OH
|
General Comments |
| Jerry Longbotham |
Capitan, NM
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Christina Lucchesi |
|
General Comments |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Daniel MacKinnon |
|
General Comments |
| Paul Macomb |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Paul Macomb |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Charlie Martin |
North Richland Hills, TX
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Lyle Maynard |
Lewistown, ID
|
General Comments |
| Jason Mazzotta |
|
General Comments |
| Robert McPhail |
Lynnwood, WA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Robert McPhail |
Lynnwood, WA
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Robert McPhail |
Lynnwood, WA
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Robert McPhail |
Lynnwood, WA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Robert Mehan |
Metairie, LA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Carlos Menacho |
Miami, FL
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Carlos Menacho |
Miami, FL
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Carlos Menacho |
Miami, FL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Carlos Menacho |
Miami, FL
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Vicki Mercer |
San Jose, CA
|
General Comments |
| Mary Elen Mercer |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Rebecca Mervine |
|
General Comments |
| Terry Miller |
Fryeburg, ME
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| June Mire |
New Orleans, LA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Bob Morse |
|
General Comments |
| Norman Mulvenon |
Oak Ridge, TN
|
General Comments |
| Catherine Murray |
Johnson City, Tennessee
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Jon Nauman |
Chugiak, AK
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Kenny Neil |
Moorhead, MN
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Rob Nerenberg |
|
General Comments |
| Ken Nimmer |
Saint Paul, MN
|
General Comments |
| Jerry Nine |
Rifle, CO
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Jessica Norris |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Jessica Norris |
Richmond, VA
|
|
| Julia Norton |
|
General Comments |
| Robert Novak |
Herndon, VA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Margaret O'Neal |
Grimesland, NC
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Marshall Osborne |
Lexington, KY
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Barbara Parrish |
Richburg, SC
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jim Paschall |
Paradise, TX
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Don Patterson |
Princeton, ID
|
General Comments |
| Bob Peckman |
Roanoke, VA
|
General Comments |
| Jamie Perkins |
San Leandro, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Jamie Perkins |
San Leandro, CA
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Keith Peters |
Jackson, WY
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Allen Poe |
Laredo, TX
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Rebecca Poplawsky |
Boerne, TX
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section D, Question 3. What aspects of adaptive management may, or may not, require subsequent NEPA analyses? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section E, Question 2. What points of comparison could an agency use when reviewing another agency's use of a similar categorical exclusion in order to establish a new categorical exclusion? |
| Lois Pratt |
|
General Comments |
| Dan Randolph |
Durango, Colorado
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| P K Rao |
Lawrenceville, NJ
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| P K Rao |
Lawrenceville, NJ
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| P K Rao |
Lawrenceville, NJ
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mark Ray |
Alexandria, VA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mary S. Reed |
Scotia, NY
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Michael Replogle |
Washington, DC
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Jo Ann Roach |
Hinton, WV
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Christopher Robinson |
|
General Comments |
| Elizabeth Rogers |
Iron River, MI
|
General Comments |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Kya Saladin |
Yuma, AZ
|
General Comments |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Jeff Saxton |
Ridgefield Park, NJ
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| David Schuchardt |
seattle, WA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Juanita Scroggings |
|
General Comments |
| Gloria Jean Shirar |
Bristol, PA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Richard Siegel |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Paul Silveira |
Chico, CA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Paul Silveira |
Chico, CA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Paul Silveira |
Chico, CA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Nancy Singleton |
Houston, TX
|
General Comments |
| John Skrodenis |
|
General Comments |
| Robert Smythe |
Chevy Chase, MD
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Laura Solomon |
|
General Comments |
| Sally Spangler |
Floyd, VA
|
General Comments |
| Paul Speranza |
|
General Comments |
| Maginum Spiritwolf |
|
General Comments |
| Gregory Springer |
Coolville, OH
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Gregory Springer |
Coolville, OH
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Gregory Springer |
Coolville, OH
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Charles Stagg |
Fort Polk, LA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Herb Stahl |
|
General Comments |
| David Stanish |
Moscow, ID
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| David Stanish |
Moscow, ID
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Robert Stanton |
|
General Comments |
| Alicia Starr |
|
General Comments |
| John Steffenson |
Broomfield, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jim Steitz |
Logan, UT
|
General Comments |
| Craig Stern |
Los Angeles, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| David Stevens |
Saint Paul, MN
|
General Comments |
| Penelope Stirling |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Debra Struhsacker |
Reno, NV
|
General Comments |
| Dan Sullivan |
Hotchkiss, Colorado
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Dan Sullivan |
Hotchkiss, Colorado
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Robert Swennes |
Arlington, VA
|
General Comments |
| Skip Swenson |
Seattle, WA
|
General Comments |
| Olga Taylor |
West Chester, PA
|
General Comments |
| Jeffrey Teichert |
Bellingham, WA
|
General Comments |
| John Tessmer |
San Diego, CA
|
General Comments |
| Rachel Thomas |
Huachuca City, AZ
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Rachel Thomas |
Huachuca City, AZ
|
General Comments |
| blair thompson |
Idyllwild, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| blair thompson |
Idyllwild, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Chris Tootell |
Missoula, MT
|
General Comments |
| Doug Topp |
|
General Comments |
| Tim Trotter |
Hamilton, MT
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Douglas Troutman |
Lakeview, OR
|
General Comments |
| Charles Urban |
Dracut, MA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Jeff van Ee |
Las Vegas, NV
|
General Comments |
| Rod Vaughn |
Cheyenne, WY
|
Section E, Question 2. What points of comparison could an agency use when reviewing another agency's use of a similar categorical exclusion in order to establish a new categorical exclusion? |
| V Villanova |
|
General Comments |
| Sharon Votaw |
Tracy, CA
|
General Comments |
| Tina Weeks |
Challis, ID
|
General Comments |
| James Wellman |
Palmer, AK
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Stacy Williams |
Indianapolis, IN
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Stacy Williams |
Indianapolis, IN
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Stacy Williams |
Indianapolis, IN
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jeffrey Williams |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Ian Willsher |
Milton Keynes, England
|
General Comments |
| Susan Wingate |
Plymouth, NH
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Susan Wingate |
Plymouth, NH
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Susan Wingate |
Plymouth, NH
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Chris Witzky |
Glastonbury, CT
|
General Comments |
| Harold Wollenhaupt |
Stockton, IL
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Magdalene Wooten |
|
General Comments |
| Willis B. Worcester |
Salem, OR
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Willis B. Worcester |
Salem, OR
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Cynthia Wright |
Palm City, FL
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Steve Yaffe |
Falls Church, VA
|
General Comments |
| Jerry Young |
Winslow, ME
|
General Comments |
| Ramie Zomisky |
|
General Comments |
Comments Intro
|
