Comments Received
Name |
City, State |
Question |
| |
Pierre, SD
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Dorothy |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| 16 Organizations |
|
General Comments |
| Annika Abel |
|
General Comments |
| Jean Ackor |
Springfield, VA
|
General Comments |
| Kent Akin |
Johnson City, TN
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Kent Akin |
Johnson City, TN
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Jan Alexander |
Unity, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Jack Allen |
|
General Comments |
| Miscelle Allison |
Yellow Jacket, CO
|
General Comments |
| Steven Altizer |
Mechanicsville, VA
|
General Comments |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section E, Question 2. What points of comparison could an agency use when reviewing another agency's use of a similar categorical exclusion in order to establish a new categorical exclusion? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Elsa Alvear |
Homestead, FL
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Don Amador |
Oakley, CA
|
General Comments |
| Don Amador |
Oakley, CA
|
General Comments |
| Ken Anderson |
Burbank, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Ralph Appy Ph D |
San Pedro, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Joni Arends |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Joni Arends |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Joni Arends |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Joni Arends |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Jay Armbruster |
Knoxville, TN
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Richard Artley |
Grangeville, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Bonnie Atwood |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Phillip Aune |
SACRAMENTO, CA
|
General Comments |
| Michael Azerrad |
New York, NY
|
General Comments |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section E, Question 2. What points of comparison could an agency use when reviewing another agency's use of a similar categorical exclusion in order to establish a new categorical exclusion? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Thomas Bach |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Sherman Bamford |
Missoula, MT
|
General Comments |
| Thomas Barile |
Lake Shore, CA
|
General Comments |
| William P. Jr. Barron |
Fairborn, OH
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Lesa Barton |
Grants Pass, OR
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Lesa Barton |
Grants Pass, Oregon
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Lesa Barton |
Grants Pass, Oregon
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Robert Barton |
Grants Pass, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Ron Bass |
Sacramento, CA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Ron Bass |
Sacramento, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Ron Bass |
Sacramento, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Ron Bass |
Sacramento, CA
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Vernon Bates |
Nashville, TN
|
General Comments |
| Vernon Bates |
Nashville, TN
|
General Comments |
| Chris Bayham |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Darrell Bazzell |
Madison, WI
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Betty & George Beaver |
Hot Springs National Park, AR
|
General Comments |
| Frank Bennett |
Princeton, ID
|
General Comments |
| Gregory Bennett |
Ludlow, MA
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Gregory Bennett |
Ludlow, MA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Gregory Bennett |
Ludlow, MA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Gregory Bennett |
Ludlow, MA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Jesse Bennett |
Pomfret, MD
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Dick Benoit |
Reno, NV
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Dick Benoit |
Reno, NV
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Dick Benoit |
Reno, NV
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Dick Benoit |
Reno, NV
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Wanda Benton |
Salem, MO
|
General Comments |
| Michael Berry |
Salt Lake City, UT
|
General Comments |
| Ronald Berry |
Liberty, MO
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Ronald Berry |
Liberty, MO
|
Section D, Question 3. What aspects of adaptive management may, or may not, require subsequent NEPA analyses? |
| Ronald Berry |
Liberty, MO
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Ronald Berry |
Liberty, MO
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Raymond Berube |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Bryan Bird |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Linda Blum |
Quincy, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Steven PE Borell |
Anchorage, AK
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Ray Bornstein |
|
General Comments |
| Cassandra Botts |
Joseph, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Carla Boucher |
Chesapeake, VA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Tricia Bourgal Cernoch |
|
General Comments |
| Dru Bower |
Casper, WY
|
General Comments |
| Jerry Boyer |
Spearfish, SD
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| David Bradshaw |
|
General Comments |
| Pete Brady |
|
General Comments |
| Lowell Braxton |
Salt Lake City, UT
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Brian Broadus |
Charlottesville, VA
|
General Comments |
| David Brown |
Denver, CO
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Susan Jane Brown |
Vancouver, WA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Waylen Brucker |
|
General Comments |
| Bill Brunworth |
Redstone, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Janice Bryson |
Tolleson, AZ
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Sharon Buccino |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Sharon Buccino |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Stephen Buckley |
West Chatham, MA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Stephen Buckley |
West Chatham, MA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Stephen Buckley |
West Chatham, MA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Stephen Buckley |
West Chatham, MA
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| James Burgess II |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| George Burgoyne Jr |
Lansing, MI
|
General Comments |
| George Burgoyne Jr |
Lansing, MI
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jack Bush |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Nathaniel Butts |
Bowling Green, KY
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Diane Buxbaum |
Brooklyn, NY
|
General Comments |
| Lynda Calore |
New York, NY
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| J Campbell |
|
General Comments |
| Anita Canovas |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| James Carrow |
|
General Comments |
| Mike Casabonne |
Roswell, NM
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| James Caswell |
Boise, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Cristi Cave |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Richard Chamberlin |
|
General Comments |
| Miles Champion |
|
General Comments |
| Gene Chandler |
Concord, NH
|
General Comments |
| Adam Chase |
Pasadena, CA
|
General Comments |
| Carroll Chase |
Ashdown, AR
|
General Comments |
| Sally Cheung |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Sally Cheung |
Salt Lake City, UT
|
General Comments |
| Charles "Pat" Childers |
Cody, WY
|
General Comments |
| Jim & Sue Chilton |
Arivaca, AZ
|
General Comments |
| John Chinn |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| John Chinn |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Kenneth Christenson |
|
General Comments |
| John Clancy |
Milwaukee, WI
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Ray Clark |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Patricia Clary |
Arcata, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Patty Clary |
Eureka, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mike Clayton |
|
General Comments |
| Susan Clemens |
Running Springs, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Jerry Coalgate |
Alexandria, VA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Sanford Cohen |
Prescott Valley, AZ
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Sanford Cohen |
Prescott Valley, AZ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Michael Collins |
Whitefish, MT
|
General Comments |
| Steve Cone |
Farmington, NM
|
General Comments |
| Steve Cone |
Farmington, NM
|
General Comments |
| Steve Cone |
Farmington, NM
|
General Comments |
| Douglas Cornett |
Marquette, MI
|
General Comments |
| Rose Comstock Correira |
Quincy, CA
|
General Comments |
| William Costa |
Sacramento, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Karen Cowan |
Albuquerque, NM
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Stephen Cox |
Fort Worth, TX
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Susan Crampton |
Okanogan County, WA
|
General Comments |
| Barbara Crayton |
|
General Comments |
| Jake Cummins |
Bozeman, MT
|
General Comments |
| Scott Curtis |
Seattle, WA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Carold Cutshall |
Madison, WI
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Randall Dahl |
Palmer, AK
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Thomas Darin |
Lander, WY
|
General Comments |
| Mary Darling |
Tucson, AZ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Mary Darling |
Tucson, AZ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Mary Darling |
Tucson, AZ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Laura Davimes |
Chesterfield, VA
|
General Comments |
| Evan Davis |
Glen Allen, VA
|
General Comments |
| Evan Davis |
Glen Allen, VA
|
General Comments |
| James Davis |
Erie, PA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Dennis Day |
Happy Camp, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| James De Pree |
Yreka, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Judd DeBoer |
McCall, ID
|
General Comments |
| Mitch DeGregorio |
Sacramento, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Ross D'Elia |
Henniker, NH
|
General Comments |
| Susan Delles |
Rogue River, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Dan Dessecker |
Rice Lake, WI
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Cheryl Deutsch |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Cheryl Deutsch |
Glen Allen, VA
|
General Comments |
| Diane Dillard |
Vancouver, WA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Susan Dobbelaere |
Bonner Springs, KS
|
General Comments |
| Mark Donham |
Brookport, IL
|
General Comments |
| A Doran |
Golden, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| A Doran |
Golden, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Thomas Doyle |
Corrales, NM
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Daniel Dructor |
Cleveland, TX
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| William Dryden |
Boise, ID
|
General Comments |
| Bruce Dunn |
Joseph, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| John Dye |
Houston, TX
|
General Comments |
| Michael Eagan |
Sacramento, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Daniel Efseaff |
Chico, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Kevin J Egan |
Brooklyn Heights, NY
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Ed Ehlers |
Sacramento, CA
|
General Comments |
| Tim Eichenberg |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Charlie Elbert |
Santa Barbara, CA
|
General Comments |
| Patricia Elliott |
Altadena, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Kirk Emerson |
Tucson, AZ
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Ellen Engstedt |
Helena, MT
|
General Comments |
| Francis Esposito |
|
General Comments |
| W Neil Evans |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Fred Fall |
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Arthur Feinstein |
San Francisco, CA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Bari Feinstein |
Glen Rock, NJ
|
General Comments |
| John Felleman |
Syracuse, NY
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| John Felleman |
Syracuse, NY
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Robert Fener |
Amherst, Va
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Shannon Fisk |
Chicago, IL
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Janet Flanagan |
Willows, CA
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Gloria Flora |
Helena, MT
|
General Comments |
| Gloria Flora |
Helena, MT
|
General Comments |
| Jo Ellen Force |
Moscow, ID
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Jo Ellen Force |
Moscow, ID
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Jo Ellen Force |
Moscow, ID
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Jo Ellen Force |
Moscow, ID
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Jo Ellen Force |
Moscow, ID
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Jo Ellen Force |
Moscow, ID
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Jeff Forester |
Minneapolis, MN
|
General Comments |
| Craig Foss |
Boise, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Vickie Foster |
|
General Comments |
| Maregaret Ann Spiers Frank |
Vashon Island, WA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Margaret Ann Spiers Frank |
Vashon Island, WA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Margaret Ann Spiers Frank |
Vashon Island, WA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Kathy Freas Ph D |
Sacramento, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Ann Frisch |
Oshkosh, WI
|
General Comments |
| Robert Frost |
Sacramento, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Sarah Gasiewicz |
North Las Vegas, NV
|
General Comments |
| Sarah Gasiewicz |
North Las Vegas, NV
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| David Gerow |
Kilauea, Hi
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Michael S. Giaimo, Esq. |
Concord, NH
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| John Gifford |
Skykomish, WA
|
General Comments |
| Steve Gil |
Dyer, IN
|
General Comments |
| Brenda Gillen |
Manitou Springs, CO
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Debbie Giniewicz |
|
General Comments |
| Joe Glenn |
|
General Comments |
| David Goode |
Jamestown, KY
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Charles Goodman Ph D |
Birmingham, AL
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Declan Gould |
|
General Comments |
| Declan Gould |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Maeve Gould |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Maeve Gould |
|
General Comments |
| Owen Graham |
Ketchikan, AK
|
General Comments |
| Michael Grauer |
|
General Comments |
| Ruth Greenberg |
Grants Pass, Oregon
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| John Griffith |
Coquille, OR
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| John Griffith |
Coquille, OR
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| John Griffith |
Coquille, OR
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| K L Bliss & P Andrew Groseta |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Cheryl Furlong Gross |
Williamsburg, VA
|
General Comments |
| Katherine Groves |
Ellijay, GA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Carolyn Guedri |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Carolyn Guedri |
Glen Allen, VA
|
General Comments |
| Gary Gunnels |
South Royalton, VT
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Melissa Guzman |
Albuquerque, NM
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Pat Gwin |
Tahlequah, OK
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mark Habbeshaw |
Kanab, UT
|
General Comments |
| Willy Hagge |
Alturas, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Gary Hall |
Olney, MT
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Stephen Hall |
Sacramento, CA
|
General Comments |
| Ken Hamilton |
Laramie, WY
|
General Comments |
| Thomas Hammond |
Seattle, WA
|
General Comments |
| Jeff Hanson |
Ashland, OR
|
General Comments |
| James Harless |
Oak Ridge, TN
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Robert Harms |
Bismarck, ND
|
General Comments |
| Carla Harper |
Cortez, CO
|
General Comments |
| Cloyd Harrison |
Vernal, UT
|
|
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section D, Question 3. What aspects of adaptive management may, or may not, require subsequent NEPA analyses? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Shelley Hartmann |
Pioche, NV
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Peter Havens |
Bainbridge Island, WA
|
General Comments |
| Amy Hayes |
Maryville, TN
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Justin Hayes |
Boise, ID
|
General Comments |
| Mike Hayward |
Enterprise, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Robert Hedberg |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Jack Hedlund |
Kane, PA
|
General Comments |
| Patrick Heffernan |
Kalispell, MT
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Thomas Heffernan |
Eglin Air Force Base, FL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Doug Heiken |
Portland, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Peter Hendrick |
Alstead, NH
|
General Comments |
| Steve Henson |
Waynesville, NC
|
General Comments |
| karry herrington |
garland, TX
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| John Hessenbuttel |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Benn Higgins |
Sacramento, CA
|
General Comments |
| Leslie Hight |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Lin Hintze |
Challis, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Jennifer Hoffman |
Jacksonville, FL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jennifer Hoffman |
Jacksonville, FL
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| John Hoffmann |
Sacramento, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Richard Hoffmann |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Elizabeth Holbrook |
Columbia Falls, MT
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Elizabeth Holbrook |
Columbia Falls, MT
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Heidi Holeman |
Norman, OK
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Karen Hood |
Buellton, CA
|
General Comments |
| Tim Hopkins |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| John Horsley |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Steven Huffaker |
Boise, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Jim Hunter |
New Vernon, NJ
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section D, Question 3. What aspects of adaptive management may, or may not, require subsequent NEPA analyses? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Jack Irish |
New Meadows, ID
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Dr John Irving |
|
General Comments |
| Pamela Irwin |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| lena james |
Olive Hill, KY
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Angela Janacaro |
Helena, MT
|
General Comments |
| Travis Jarrell |
San Diego, CA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Travis Jarrell |
San Diego, CA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Joseph Mendelson III & Peter Jenkins |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Peter Jenkins |
Washington, DC
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Sidney Jenson |
Farmington, UT
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| David Jeronimus |
Duluth, MN
|
General Comments |
| Robert Johnson |
Albuquerque, NM
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Tony Johnson |
|
General Comments |
| Brian Jones |
|
General Comments |
| Kenneth Jones |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Timothy Jones |
El Centro, CA
|
General Comments |
| Charles Justice |
Bowie, MD
|
General Comments |
| Scott Kaden |
Hood River, OR
|
General Comments |
| Gary Kaminski |
Lingonier, PA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Robert Ph D Kanter |
Long Beach, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| David Kaplan |
Davis, CA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| David Kaplan |
Davis, CA
|
General Comments |
| John Kastl |
Tacoma, WA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Judy Keeler |
Animas, NM
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Judy Keeler |
Animas, NM
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Vilas Keith |
|
General Comments |
| Christine Keller |
Hartville, OH
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Kathy Kelly |
Arlington, VA
|
General Comments |
| James Earl Kennamer Ph D |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Shawn Keough |
Coeur D'Alene, ID
|
General Comments |
| Loren Kilp |
|
General Comments |
| Patricia & John King |
Tucson, AZ
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Thomas King |
Silver Spring, MD
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Lisa Kirk |
Bozeman, MT
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Derrick Knowles |
Republic, WA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Dana Knox |
Glen Ellyn, IL
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Dana Knox |
Glen Ellyn, IL
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Dana Knox |
Glen Ellyn, IL
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Dana Knox |
Glen Ellyn, IL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Rachel Kondor |
Tucson, AZ
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Larry Kotchman |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| James Kotcon |
Morgantown, WV
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Christopher Krupp |
Seattle, WA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Dennis Kucinich |
Lakewood, OH
|
General Comments |
| Jonathan Kusel |
Taylorsville, CA
|
General Comments |
| Joseph Lamphear |
Santa Ana, CA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Linda Lance |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Pat Larson |
La Grande, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Kim Lawson |
Kanab, UT
|
General Comments |
| Jay Lazarus |
Santa Fe, NM
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Bob Lee |
Fort Collins, CO
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Judith Lee |
Bettendorf, IA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Luis Lemus |
|
General Comments |
| Stuart Levit |
Bozeman, MT
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Geraldine Link |
Lakewood, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Carl Livingston |
Reserve, NM
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Terry Jonathan Lodge |
Toledo, OH
|
General Comments |
| Jerry Longbotham |
Capitan, NM
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Richard Loughery |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Christina Lucchesi |
|
General Comments |
| Michael Luzier |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Robert Lynch |
Pheonix, AZ
|
General Comments |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Douglas MacDonald |
Olympia, WA
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Daniel MacKinnon |
|
General Comments |
| Paul Macomb |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Paul Macomb |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Tom Magness |
Fairfax, VA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Wendell Malin |
Minneapolis, MN
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Brandt Mannchen |
Houston, TX
|
General Comments |
| Diane Mann-Klager |
Aberdeen, SD
|
General Comments |
| Ara Marderosian |
Weldon, CA
|
General Comments |
| Charlie Martin |
North Richland Hills, TX
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Guy Martin |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Lyle Maynard |
Lewistown, ID
|
General Comments |
| Jason Mazzotta |
|
General Comments |
| Kevin McCarthy |
White Pass, WA
|
General Comments |
| Pat McElroy |
Olympia, WA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Larry McLand |
Moscow, ID
|
General Comments |
| Robert McPhail |
Lynnwood, WA
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Robert McPhail |
Lynnwood, WA
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Robert McPhail |
Lynnwood, WA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Robert McPhail |
Lynnwood, WA
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Robert Mehan |
Metairie, LA
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Carlos Menacho |
Miami, FL
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Carlos Menacho |
Miami, FL
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Carlos Menacho |
Miami, FL
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Carlos Menacho |
Miami, FL
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Mary Elen Mercer |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Vicki Mercer |
San Jose, CA
|
General Comments |
| Rebecca Mervine |
|
General Comments |
| Thomas Michaels |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Terry Miller |
Fryeburg, ME
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| June Mire |
New Orleans, LA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Joseph Montgomery |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Robert Morgan |
Salt Lake City, UT
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Bob Morse |
|
General Comments |
| Claire Moseley |
Denver, CO
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Norman Mulvenon |
Oak Ridge, TN
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Norman Mulvenon |
Oak Ridge, TN
|
General Comments |
| Catherine Murray |
Johnson City, Tennessee
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Catherine Murray |
Johnson City, TN
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Joseph Musil Jr |
Philadelphia, PA
|
General Comments |
| Joseph Musil Jr |
Philadelphia, PA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Joseph Musil Jr |
Philadelphia, PA
|
General Comments |
| Jon Nauman |
Chugiak, AK
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Dave Navecky |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Kenny Neil |
Moorhead, MN
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Dave Nelson |
Boise, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Rob Nerenberg |
|
General Comments |
| Vivian Newman |
South Thomaston, ME
|
General Comments |
| Richard Newpher |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Beth Niderman |
Salt Lake City, UT
|
General Comments |
| Ken Nimmer |
Saint Paul, MN
|
General Comments |
| Jerry Nine |
Rifle, CO
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Jessica Norris |
Richmond, VA
|
|
| Jessica Norris |
Richmond, VA
|
General Comments |
| Julia Norton |
|
General Comments |
| Robert Novak |
Herndon, VA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Stephen Novak |
Asheville, NC
|
General Comments |
| Jane O'Keeffe |
Salem, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| John O'Keeffe |
Adel, OR
|
General Comments |
| Margaret O'Neal |
Grimesland, NC
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Bill O'Rights, II |
Washington, DC
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| David Ortman |
Seattle, WA
|
General Comments |
| Marshall Osborne |
Lexington, KY
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Buck Parks |
Susanville, CA
|
General Comments |
| Barbara Parrish |
Richburg, SC
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Thomas Partin |
Portland, OR
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Jim Paschall |
Paradise, TX
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Don Patterson |
Princeton, ID
|
General Comments |
| Bob Peckman |
Roanoke, VA
|
General Comments |
| Jamie Perkins |
San Leandro, CA
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Jamie Perkins |
San Leandro, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Keith Peters |
Jackson, WY
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mike Petersen |
Spokane, WA
|
General Comments |
| R Max Peterson |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Rick Pignone |
North Powder, OR
|
General Comments |
| Allen Poe |
Laredo, TX
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Rebecca Poplawsky |
Boerne, TX
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section D, Question 3. What aspects of adaptive management may, or may not, require subsequent NEPA analyses? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section D, Question 2. How can environmental impact analyses be structured to consider adaptive management? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section D, Question 1. What factors are considered when deciding to use an adaptive management approach? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section C, Question 2. Please provide examples of how programmatic analyses have been used to develop, maintain and strengthen environmental management systems, and examples of how an existing environmental management system can facilitate and strengthen NEPA analyses. Examples of an environmental management system may include but are not limited to systems certified under ISO 14001 (further information on ISO 14001 can be found on the Web at: http://es.epa.gov/partners/iso/iso.html). |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section C, Question 1. What types of issues best lend themselves to programmatic review, and how can they best be addressed in a programmatic analysis to avoid duplication in subsequent tiered analysis? Please provide examples with brief descriptions of the nature of the action or program, decisions made, factors used to evaluate the appropriate depth of the analyses, and the efficiencies realized by the analysis or in subsequent tiers. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section E, Question 2. What points of comparison could an agency use when reviewing another agency's use of a similar categorical exclusion in order to establish a new categorical exclusion? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section B, Question 1. What are the characteristics of an effective joint-lead or cooperating agency relationship/process? Provide example(s) and describe the issues resolved and benefits gained, as well as unresolved issues and obstacles. Such examples may include, but are not limited to, differences in agencies' policies, funding limitations, and public perceptions. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Herbert Powers, Jr. |
Katy, TX
|
Section B, Question 2. What barriers or challenges preclude or hinder the ability to enter into effective collaborative agreements that establish joint-lead or cooperating agency status? |
| Lois Pratt |
|
General Comments |
| Frank Priestley |
Boise, ID
|
General Comments |
| Alan Prouty |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Cope R E |
Salmon, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Randy Rajala |
Deer River, MN
|
General Comments |
| Dan Randolph |
Durango, Colorado
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Dan Randolph |
|
General Comments |
| P K Rao |
Lawrenceville, NJ
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| P K Rao |
Lawrenceville, NJ
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| P K Rao |
Lawrenceville, NJ
|
Section D, Question 4. What factors should be considered (e.g., cost, timing, staffing needs, environmental risks) when determining what monitoring techniques and levels of monitoring intensity are appropriate during the implementation of an adaptive management regime? How does this differ from current monitoring activities? |
| Mark Ray |
Alexandria, VA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Mary S. Reed |
Scotia, NY
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Michael Replogle |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Michael Replogle |
Washington, DC
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Diane Riley |
Boise, ID
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| James Riley |
Coeur D'Alene, ID
|
General Comments |
| Jo Ann Roach |
Hinton, WV
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Christopher Robinson |
|
General Comments |
| Elizabeth Rogers |
Iron River, MI
|
General Comments |
| Daniel Rosenberg |
Derwood, MD
|
General Comments |
| T Peter Ruane |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Tom Runyan |
Albuquerque, NM
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Randy Sackett |
Mazama, WA
|
General Comments |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 4. What information management and retrieval tools do you use to access, query, and manipulate data when preparing analyses or reviewing analyses? What are the key functions and characteristics of these systems? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 3. Do you maintain databases and other sources of environmental information for environmental analyses? Are these information sources standing or project specific? Please describe any protocols or standardization efforts that you feel should be utilized in the development and maintenance of these systems. |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section B, Question 3. What specific areas should be emphasized during training to facilitate joint-lead and cooperating agency status? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 2. What are the barriers or challenges faced in using information technologies in the NEPA process? What factors should be considered in assessing and validating the quality of the information? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 6. What information management technologies have been particularly effective in communicating with stakeholders about environmental issues and incorporating environmental values into agency planning and decision making (e.g., web sites to gather public input or inform the public about a proposed action or technological tools to manage public comments)? What objections or concerns have been raised concerning the use of these tools (e.g., concerns about broad public access)? |
| Christine Saladin |
Yuma, Arizona
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Kya Saladin |
Yuma, AZ
|
General Comments |
| Genevieve Salmonson |
Honolulu, HI
|
General Comments |
| Ed Salsedo |
Orick, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Jeff Saxton |
Ridgefield Park, NJ
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Rodger Schlickeisen |
|
General Comments |
| Judith Schmidt |
Orick, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Donald Schregardus |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| David Schuchardt |
seattle, WA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| T Schulz |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Juanita Scroggings |
|
General Comments |
| Cece Sellgren |
Martinez, CA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Mark Semlek |
Sundance, WY
|
General Comments |
| Steve Shaffer |
Sacramento, CA
|
General Comments |
| Rebecca Sheehan |
Sacramento, CA
|
General Comments |
| Jonathan Shick |
Teton Village, WY
|
General Comments |
| Randy Shipman |
Rock Springs, WY
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Gloria Jean Shirar |
Bristol, PA
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Donna Short |
Sweet Home, OR
|
General Comments |
| Richard Siegel |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Paul Silveira |
Chico, CA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| Paul Silveira |
Chico, CA
|
Section E, Question 3. Are improvements needed in the process that agencies use to establish a new categorical exclusion? If so, please describe them. |
| Paul Silveira |
Chico, CA
|
Section A, Question 5. What are your preferred methods of conveying or receiving information about proposed actions and NEPA analyses and for receiving NEPA documents (e.g., paper, CD ROM, web-site, public meeting, radio, television)? Explain the basis for your preferences. |
| David Simpson |
Billings, MT
|
General Comments |
| Nancy Singleton |
Houston, TX
|
General Comments |
| Frederick Skaer |
Washington, DC
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| John Skrodenis |
|
General Comments |
| Robert Smythe |
Chevy Chase, MD
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| William Snape |
Washington, DC
|
General Comments |
| Laura Solomon |
|
General Comments |
| James Souby |
Denver, CO
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Sally Spangler |
Floyd, VA
|
General Comments |
| Paul Speranza |
|
General Comments |
| Maginum Spiritwolf |
|
General Comments |
| Deanna Spooner |
Eugene, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Deanna Spooner |
Eugene, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Deanna Spooner |
Eugene, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Deanna Spooner |
Eugene, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Deanna Spooner |
Eugene, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Deanna Spooner |
Eugene, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Deanna Spooner |
Eugene, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Deanna Spooner |
Eugene, OR
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Gregory Springer |
Coolville, OH
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Gregory Springer |
Coolville, OH
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Gregory Springer |
Coolville, OH
|
Section E, Question 1. What information, data, studies, etc., should be required as the basis for establishing a categorical exclusion? |
| Charles Stagg |
Fort Polk, LA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Herb Stahl |
|
General Comments |
| David Stanish |
Moscow, ID
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| David Stanish |
Moscow, ID
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Robert Stanton |
|
General Comments |
| Alicia Starr |
|
General Comments |
| William Steel |
Crystal Mountain, WA
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| John Yellow Bird Steele |
Pine Ridge, SD
|
General Comments |
| John Steffenson |
Broomfield, CO
|
Section A, Question 1. Where do you find data and background studies to either prepare NEPA analyses or to provide input or to review and prepare comments on NEPA analyses? The information may include scientific and statistical information in printed or electronic form. Examples include but are not limited to species or wetlands inventories, air quality data, field surveys, predictive models, and trend analyses. |
| Jim Steitz |
Logan, UT
|
General Comments |
| Craig Stern |
Los Angeles, CA
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| David Stevens |
Saint Paul, MN
|
General Comments |
| Penelope Stirling |
|
Multiple Questions Addressed |
| Rex Storm |
Salem, OR
|
General Comments |
| Michael Stroben |
Charlotte, NC
|
General Comments |
| Debra Struhsacker |
Reno, NV
|
General Comments |
| Dan Sullivan |
Hotchkiss, Colorado
|
Section F. Additional Areas for Consideration: In addition to the topics described above, the NEPA Task Force will consider comments on NEPA practices that would improve and modernize NEPA implementation. |
| Dan Sullivan |
Hotchkiss, Colorado
|
Section A, Question 7. What factors should be considered in balancing public involvement and information security? |
| Robert Swennes |
Arlington, VA
|
General Comments |
| Skip Swenson |
Seattle, WA
|
General Comments |
| Donald Taylor |
St. Louis, MS
|
General Comments |
| Olga Taylor |
West Chester, PA
|
General Comments |
| Jeffrey Teichert |
Bellingh
| |